Posts Tagged ‘tv’

The Y Series: We Need an F1 Channel

Saturday, November 18th, 2006

I have DirecTV. I have all the channels. Well, almost all of them anyway. There are numerous sports, news, entertainment, and movie channels. Some of them, such as the horse racing channel TVG, don’t really deserve to be on air. I mean, seriously, who can watching horses running around a track 24/7. It’s not like the horses can give post-race press conferences. They have no personalities. Don’t get me started on the jockeys. All 4’10″ and 76 lbs. of them. That’s the kind a person all men can relate too.

With that kind of low standard for having a TV channel, why isn’t there one for F1? Ok, i can understand it not being available here in the US. But, why isn’t there one at least in Europe. How much content is there on F1? There’s got to be more than enough to sustain a station. There’s probably full races on tape for probably every race since about 1970. How hard would it be to show some of the better ones? Or what about entire seasons? We all know news is slow between now and about a week before the first race. Why not replay great season. Do a race a day or something. That’ll take a couple weeks. Show seasons reviews. Do profiles on teams, drivers, tracks, etc. from past and present. Maybe even have a one hour weekly show in the offseason to keep us up to date on things. Maybe even show tests live. I know that’s a stretch, but it’s a thought.

During the season, there could be race replays, onboard race replays, and alternate angles not shown during the race. If Mr. Howard’s suggestion of recording onboards on every car for entire race was implemented, we could see onboard action of events missed during the regular broadcast. There could be a sort of reality TV show, like Speed Channel has with NBS 24/7. A TV crew could follow drivers and see inside the factories where they make the cars. They could even televise the FIA court proceeding, such as the ones we saw with Renault this year and BAR last year. There are limitless ideas.

With all of the history, personality, technology, and drama that is a part of F1, why has an F1 channel never come to fruition? The answer lies at the top: Bernie Ecclestone.

_bernie_ecclestone_previsioni.jpg

Bernie is 76. Even in this day in age, that’s getting on in years. He was born in 1930. The Depression was barely a year old when he came around. Hell, they didn’t even have TV’s. Don’t be fooled by that cell phone, his 8 year old grandson taught him how to use it. His dabblings in media include F1.com, F1 Digital for PPV, and some of the current races. F1.com is a crock. Before he took it over, live timing was freely available. Now, you much register to view it. Also, look at the store; $60 for a plain t-shirt with a F1 logo over the heart. You’re kidding right? F1 Digital failed after he couldn’t get enough people to justify the cost. Current races are getting better, but barely. Instead of working with technology, he uses it to try and make the greatest profit at the expense of the normal viewer. He won’t do an F1 channel because it involves something all old people hate, risk. What’s the risk of the store? Sure it’s outrageously priced, but some people will buy it and that’ll make up for people like me who won’t.

We probably won’t see an F1 channel as long as Bernie is around. The initial costs to get it off the ground would be to risky in Bernie’s eyes. In addition, even if it was successful, profits wouldn’t start rolling in for several years. Bernie, frankly, can’t afford to wait that long, literally and figuratively. I hope the day comes when I can watch classic grand prixs, seasons reviews, and a documentary of Ferrari during the 1981 season. If not, I may have to find something more interesting to watch, like that interview with Barbaro when he gets out a re-hab. Time to set the TiVo.

The Y Series: Speed Channel > ITV

Friday, November 3rd, 2006

When watching a race on TV, what do we want? The answer is that we want to either feel like we are actually there, or that we are a part of it. Having watched a wide variety of sports in my day, I know what i want in an announcer. I want them to be: A) Knowledgeable, B) Enthusiastic, C) Fun to listen to, and D) Know when to, and not to, talk.

Many people who have heard some commentary from the ITV and Speed Channel teams will probably side with the ITV crew. I think this is because they are British. Subconsciously, we associate that people in Europe know more about F1 than Americans do. By and large, that’s probably a fair assumption. But if I had a choice of listening to commentary from either ITV of Speed Channel, I’d take Speed Channel in a heartbeat. Y you ask? It’s simple really. The team of Varsha, Hobbs, Matchett, and Windsor is just that, a team. Varsha knows his stuff, knows his motorsports history, and, critically, knows when to shut up. This is most evident in two situations. The first is whenever FOM switches to an onboard, and the other is at the race start. How many times have we heard James Allen scream and the start, “…and the race starts……. NOWWWWWWW!!!!! (10-15 seconds)” Compare that to Varsha’s, “…turn up the volume… (4th light, 5th light…)?” David Hobbs adds his insight from his racing years, and a bit of odd-ball comedy every now and then. But, Matchett is the clincher. Being a mechanic at Benetton for 9 years, he is THE authority on F1 technology. He also still keeps in contact with with likes of Ross Brawn, Pat Symonds, and other big names in the paddock. If there’s anything new in the way of technology, not only does he know about it, but he can break it down in basic terms that the average person can understand.

Now about Martin Brundle, he may fulfill the knowledge requirements, but he is the most bloody boring announcer I’ve ever heard. It sounds like he’s count reporter reading back the transcript of the trial. Let’s use Schumacher’s engine failure in Japan as an example. The Speed crew reacted like I would have, “It’s Michael! Oh no! Can you believe it?!” Now I know ITV was at commercial when this happened, but i hypothesize that this would have been the transcript:

Allen: “And Micheal has blown up! Unbelievable! Where’s Button?! Is he going to win? O damn, there goes Alonso.”
Brundle: “Ya that’s a shame. I wonder if it’s going to rain? Is Button leading yet? Why is FOM showing Sato’s and Yamamoto’s pitstops?”

The problem with ITV is that Allen is annoying, a shrill for Button, and doesn’t know when to shut up, and Brundle is boring, a shrill for Button, and unenthusiastic. I want someone who gets excited when something exciting happens. I want them to express the emotions I’m expressing. Brundle sounds like John Kerry, really. Who wants to sound like him?